Post Published on November 17, 2011.
Last Updated on April 28, 2016 by davemackey.
I love being a fan of great products – and supporting those products with my finances. I’ve been a long-time fan and premium subscriber to SugarSync, a cloud-based backup, syncing, and web drive product. I like raving about them, and getting into arguments with folks like Steve Weir about whether Dropbox is better (nope!).
That said, I’m also a fan of making a little noise when companies don’t always treat their customers with the utmost respect they deserve. Successful business involves a symbiotic relationship between the business and the consumer, neither side can demand too much nor give too little. SugarSync has a great product, but I’m concerned that they aren’t committing enough resources to shoring up some weak spots in their current offerings, instead focusing more on new client acquisitions and business partnerships (which, again, are all well and good, but there has to be a balance).
So, here are my *beefs* with SugarSync and what I’d *really* like to see implemented in the near-term future.
The Critical Missing Components.
Currently SugarSync doesn’t utilize Microsoft‘s Volume Shadow Service (VSS) and I can’t for the life of me understand why – it is built directly into Windows and is utilized by most backup software providers. Why? Because it offers numerous huge advantages with easy implementation. Including the ability to backup files while they are in-use. This means you don’t have to close out of Outlook, an accounting application, or anything else that is actively using a file before it can be backed up.
The other big no-no SugarSync engages in (that I can think of no practical reason to exist, and which should be a very simple config file change to implement) is finite versioning of files. SugarSync currently keeps a limited number of previous versions of a file – which becomes an issue if it is a transactional file (e.g. a database – including Microsoft Outlook or any email client, rss reader, etc.). These files change all the time – in a single day they may change hundreds or thousands of times! SugarSync needs to keep these versions for as long as the user desires them to be kept – not arbitrarily deleting them!
This is Important…
- Ability to Pause/Resume Backups/Syncs – While everything in an ideal world would place nice with one another, the fact of the matter is that software oftentimes interfere with each other. It’d be great to have a way to pause backups/syncs by SugarSync. Again, I don’t run into any problems with this regularly – but it would still be a nice feature.
It’d Be Cool If…
I’m not particularly concerned about these features, but it would be cool if…
- SugarSync integrated with Google Docs, backing up all Google Docs into SugarSync and vice versa (or a subset as so desired). This would also allow mobile editing of documents (of many types) via Google Docs without needing to download the documents from SugarSync (as one must do now before editing).
- Backing Up Gmail is another useful feature. I’m not as concerned about this as the integration with Google Docs, but still, a nice freebie.
2 thoughts on “SugarSync – What is Missing?”
Dave, great summary of your beefs. I still believe that Dropbox is superior, but that’s my humble opinion. 🙂
As to your note on backing up Google Docs, I’m a little confused. Isn’t the purpose of Google Docs and GMail such that backups aren’t necessary, being cloud solutions? Enlighten me.
Let the debate continue!
I’m using SugarSync since a few month and can only recommend it to you
guys. It’s fast and supports multiple OS like Windows, Mac, iOS and
You get 5 gb for free and when you use the b.m. Link you will get 5,5
Gb for free. If you go for a premium membership (starts at 30 Gb) each
of you will get additional 10 Gb for free.
Check this out and get a 5,5 Gb account for free.